Doing Business in China: Distinguish
Business
Issues from Legal Issues
by May Hao
January
12, 2003
In
the past few weeks, I have received numerous inquiries from business people (or
their business consultants) who are in the process of setting up some sort of business
in China. Some businesses are in the form of outsourcing, some are setting up joint ventures or
wholly foreign owned enterprises, while others are acquiring an existing foreign interest or
state owned interest in a Chinese entity through a merger or acquisition
transaction. These companies all seem to have made significant progress with
respect to their China projects, but met with some unexpected issues.
I studied the issues, most of which were legal. I noted
that the reason the companies were unable to effectively resolve the issues is that they treated
legal issues as business issues and did not get appropriate legal advise at an early stage.
Let
me illustrate my point by examples.
Two businessmen, unknown to each other, told me similar
stories: when they tried to outsource their business (one for manufacturing and the other for IT),
they spent a lot of time on locating business partners and geographic locations, and handling other
business issues related to their projects in China. The process
was long, but smooth. Now, they each were
ready to sign the contract with their Chinese partner. To their surprise, however, they and their Chinese partner could
not reach agreement on certain “technical issues," such
as the methods for dispute resolution (should it be litigation or arbitration? and
if arbitration, should it be done in or outside China); the governing law for
their contract (should the contract be governed by Chinese law or the laws
of a state in the United States); the amount of the penalty for breaching the
contract, etc. Their projects, not
surprisingly, were put on hold during the impasse. I told them that these issues were not just “technical issues”: each point had significant legal
ramifications and was always the focus of joint venture negotiations.
A
medium-sized US company was about to sign a supply contract with a Chinese
state owned company. The US company had been looking for a “small factory” in
China to produce modules at low cost. When it came time to sign the contract, the US company became concerned
that the factory may not have the ability to meaningfully assume the liabilities
arising under the contract. The US company wanted the parent of the Chinese business -- a
large state owned company -- to be a party to the contract. The Chinese parent did not agree; it argued that
its subsidiary was an independent legal entity that had the legal capacity to
enjoy its rights and assume its liabilities under law; in addition, the subsidiary
was the party to perform the contract. Unable to resolve the issue, the US company asked whether it should restructure the deal. Since this
was a legal, rather than a business issue, it could have been resolved legally by requesting
the parent company give a performance guaranty.
Another
medium-sized American company plans to set up a wholly foreign owned company in China. They
have a long term plan to expand their business in China; therefore, they would want
to make sure their wholly-owned company in China has “trading authority”. They were advised that a sure way to have
trading authority is to move their subsidiary into a “bonded area” in China. They wanted me to confirm
authority. I told them
that the question depended on whether they wanted their Chinese subsidiary to have
trading authority for its own products or for the products of other companies.
A foreign investment company located in a bonded area may serve as an export
agent for other companies only if such companies are located in the same
bonded area. Currently, a foreign company may set up a joint venture trading
company with a Chinese party if they meet certain legal requirements.
There are many other different inquiries I cannot illustrate due to limited space. The point is that in order to do business in China effectively, a company needs to get legal help for legal issues at an appropriate stage. That can save a lot of time and money.
May Y. Hao provides legal services
to companies involved in China-related transactions. Ms.
Hao received the
Master of Laws
degree from China
University of
Political Science &
Law in Beijing in
1988 and a JD degree
from Northwestern
University School of
Law in 1993. After
graduation from
Northwestern, she
practiced law with
three leading US law
firms, White & Case
(New York and Hong
Kong), Baker &
McKenzie and Mayer,
Brown, Rowe & Maw
(formerly known as
Mayer, Brown &
Platt). She can be
contacted at
sradvisors@gmail.com.